The Inquirer discovers a “record” label that *isn’t evil*.
domipix rss feed
I’ve added an RSS 2.0 feed to domipix.com so if you’re into the Photo A Day thang you can keep up with the additions as they come in.
And the award for most frustrating web build goes to…
Mark Maher American Polaroids. Jesus Christ! What a mess! Just show me the freakin’ photos, for F’s sake!
Scary drive
Rollei Prego
Is it just me, or is “Prego” an odd choice of name for a super-slim camera?
Smoke
Just realised it’s been ages since I put a photo on my blog… so here you go.
More Apple bashing
Honestly! I don’t go looking for this stuff! I don’t need to – it’s like shooting fish, but more satisfying. Apple Rating: WTF is This?
Audio shaker
Put some sounds in, shake and presto!
And it doesn't even *sound* good!
Not that I’m setting out to deliberately bash the iPod Photo, but… it *buzzes*.
iPod Photo: what a let-down
What’s the point? I was kinda sorta thinking about the possibility of an iPod Photo before they came out. I don’t know why – I’m not a big Apple fan or anything. But having seen what it can(‘t) do, I have to conclude: naaah… The lack of a CF slot: that’s an important one for me, but I doubt I was very seriously expecting it to be included. But the fact that you have to get photos on there using iTunes? As opposed to just copying them over as a standard mass storage device? Can that be right? And in the same way, if you *do* use an add-on card reader, you can’t view the image files, even if you do happen to shoot JPEG. iTunes uses its own thumbnail format to allow you to view the things on the iPod.
So, what’s the point? It’s only really nice as a normal iPod, but with the addition of a nice colour screen that can show album art. But for photos, it seems it’s just a toy.